Bitget vs Bybit Fees: Which Platform Offers the Lowest Costs?
Choosing the right exchange can save you thousands in trading costs over a year. Therefore, the debate over the Best Futures Exchange often comes down to one factor: fees. This comprehensive breakdown compares the contract fees of two giants—Bitget and Bybit—across Maker/Taker rates and funding costs. Ultimately, we show you which platform offers the most cost-effective solution to maximize your futures trading profit in 2025.
Head-to-Head: Base Bitget vs Bybit Fees (Maker/Taker)
The primary cost of futures trading is the Maker/Taker fee, which is based on your execution style. This is the rate charged when you open or close a position.
Standard Tier Contract Fee Comparison
The following table compares the default (VIP 0) fee structure for perpetual futures on both exchanges.
| Fee Type | Bitget (VIP 0) | Bybit (Non-VIP) | Analysis |
| Maker Fee | 0.020% | 0.020% | Both offer the same standard Maker rate. |
| Taker Fee | 0.060% | 0.055% | Bybit is slightly cheaper on the standard Taker rate (by 0.005%). |
Key Takeaway: Bitget vs Bybit Fees are nearly identical at the base level. However, Bitget often runs limited-time promotions with 0% Maker fees to attract new liquidity. Always check their active campaigns.
The Hidden Cost: Understanding Funding Fees
Funding Fees are the costs that traders often overlook. Crucially, these are not paid to the exchange; they are paid between traders (longs pay shorts, or vice versa) to keep the contract price aligned with the spot price.
How Funding Fees Impact Bitget vs Bybit Fees
- Payment Frequency: Both exchanges typically charge or pay funding fees every 8 hours.
- Impact: If you are holding a position that is paying a high funding rate (e.g., you are long, and the rate is positive), this fee quickly erodes your profit.
The funding rate itself is market-driven and is usually similar across all major exchanges (including Bitget and Bybit) for the same coin at the same time. Therefore, your best strategy is to avoid paying it.
Pro Tip: To avoid paying the funding fee, close your position a few minutes before the 8-hour funding interval.
Strategy to Maximize Savings on Both Platforms
While the base fees are similar, your choice of strategy can create a massive difference in your actual costs.
Strategy 1: Use the Platform Token Discount
| Strategy | Bitget (Use BGB) | Bybit (Use MNT) | Savings |
| Fee Payment | Bitget does not currently offer a BGB fee payment discount for futures. | Bybit allows MNT holders to pay lower fees in some scenarios. | Check specific promotions, as Bitget relies more on volume tiers. |
Strategy 2: Focus on VIP Tier Qualification
This is where the real savings begin. Both exchanges significantly lower your Taker fees as you move up the VIP tiers based on your 30-day trading volume.
- Bitget Advantage: Bitget’s VIP system is highly accessible, often requiring lower volume than competitors to unlock the first few tiers.
- Action: If you trade high volume, compare the volume requirement for VIP 1/VIP 2 on both platforms. The one that offers you a lower Taker fee for your specific volume is the Best Futures Exchange for you.
Conclusion: Which is the Best Futures Exchange?
In summary, the base Bitget vs Bybit Fees are highly competitive and almost identical. Bybit holds a slight edge on the standard Taker rate, but Bitget often compensates with competitive promotional campaigns and a strong focus on Copy Trading (where the fee structure is slightly different).
Final Verdict: For the average, low-volume trader, the fee difference is negligible. Choose Bitget if you plan to use Copy Trading or seek high leverage on altcoins. Choose Bybit if you need the absolute lowest standard Taker fee.
Leave a Comment